judges to eventually do away with administrative and regulatory agencies. The vaccine mandate arguments are part of a much broader effort to do that, to essentially make the federal government as it is currently constructed, unconstitutional. (At the same time they will likely rule that if a state wants to take my tax money to fund religious education, or limit my right to vote, or allow businesses to discriminate, that will be ok. I mean, that's not the action of a federal agency.)

You can focus on Gorsuch's quotes and pronouncements all you want, but I think you avoid this topic. I'm not sure why. I'd bet money that you, and several others on this board, support that, too. Why not just say so? This Court is going after the Chevron doctrine.